Unanimously Agreeable Definitions of Country and Patriotism for Civilized Coexistence

To:         Honorable President, Prime Minister, Supreme Court, Leaders of Opposition, Chief Ministers,
Secretary of Sahitya Academi, Secretary of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, Chief of RSS
and All Indians

Cc:         Honorable President Barack Obama

              Please feel free to circulate.

Date:      November 27, 2015

Sub:       Unanimously agreeable rational definitions of Country and Patriotism for Civilized Coexistence

Questions have been raised about patriotism towards countries of democratically elected leaders and of widely popular stars.  What is a country?  Islam considers itself an independent country with allegiance of all Muslims, scattered over many politically bounded nations, to one god (Allah), as opposed to multitude sons or reincarnations of gods. The Indian diaspora, living abroad, cheers in unison for development of their motherland.  They sound as if they are beholden, with an implicit allegiance, to their motherland-country. Christians in disparate countries have arrogated a right to convert others into their religion, as if they together constitute a country.  Many scientists and doctors think of a borderless world with no allegiance to politically bounded nations.  Individuals thus have divers implicit allegiance beyond borders of politically bounded countries of their abode.  Is it still possible with such disparate individuals to agree, unanimously and rationally, to any specific definition of Country and associated Patriotism?  YES.

In the wake of his electoral defeat in 2008, the U.S. presidential candidate, Senator John McCain, wrote me to join a select group of individuals he had chosen for his country-first campaign.  I agreed with a condition that Senator McCain meant by Country all the enterprising individuals that produce globally competitive goods and services to prop everyone including the rulers.  My allegiance to such Country is anchored in my selfless pursuit to serve the best interest of this Country.  Senator McCain did not respond to my reply, but his country-first campaign has become dormant, if not dead.  This reinforced the epistemic veracity of my definition of Country. 

My Country is borderless.  This borderless aspect is consistent with the implicit wish of followers of religions (like Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism and Hinduism), atheism and science, scattered all over the world.  There is nothing more patriotic than serving the best interest of those (the enterprising individuals) who prop my existence on earth.  Everyone will agree to strengthen, not weaken, the hands that feed.  My definition of country is thus unanimously agreeable. 

Those who have instituted a system (rules) of governance to rob the enterprising individuals (i.e., to bite the hand that feeds) with a firm belief that the robbery would never be detected or contested may privately disagree with my definition of Country.  But can they publicly disagree with my definition of Country?  NO.  In fact, if Robber Barons had realized that their system of surreptitious robbery would be eventually exposed (as in 2008), they would wholeheartedly have agreed to dismantle their system of unfair privilege, lest the robbed enterprising individuals would stop working and demand recovery of the loot with incarceration of the robbers.  For example, what would the richest individual on earth (Hosni Mubarack, ex-President of Egypt) would be thinking in jail: freedom with normal wealth earned by serving the Country versus incarceration for the $85 billion accumulated through surreptitious robbery.        

If there is anything like salvation, it is to work for those who truly prop one's survival.  I learnt this basic value from the unflinching allegiance of dogs to those that feed them, except that I have discovered (as a human being) the TRUE MASTERS, the enterprising individuals everywhere as constituting the Country, as opposed to the self-anointed Masters of the Universe (Robber Barons) who treacherously eviscerate the Country.     

We can now fathom patriotism of anyone towards the unanimously agreeably and rationally defined Country.  Consider, for example, patriotism (towards India) of two top Bollywood stars, Amir Khan and Shah Rukh Khan.  They have claimed to be patriotic and majority have agreed as per news reports.  But have they discovered their TRUE MASTERS, the Country of enterprising individuals (within India and abroad), who toil to earn and part their savings for entertainment to financially prop the stars?  The stars' quietude and tolerance of the systemic robbery of their toiling fans shows unawareness of their true Country and, thus, proves irrationality of their claim for (unanimously agreeable and rationally defined) patriotism. 

India like any other politically bounded geographical territory is composed of two subsets of people: enterprising individuals (true Country) who prop everyone and the usurpers who only sap the Country.  Any claim of patriotism for India, but not for the Country within India, will mean allegiance only to the usurpers that sap the Country.  The usurpers that sap and weaken the Country as well as those who have allegiance towards the usurpers are rationally unpatriotic.        

The Robber Barons have obviously succeeded over millennia to continue their system of robbery of the Country by anointing and inducing tamable pundits and political leaders willing to share the loot to chime favorably for such a system. But their 'invincible' might failed to suppress the Country forever, thanks to selfless dissemination of research on fundamentally fair and unanimously agreeable system of governance (the essence of Hindutva) that uniquely serves the Country's best interest.  The catastrophic financial crash of 2008 not only bared the systemic robbery of the Country but also made clear that the first-best efficient system of governance (essence of Hindutva) is unique, fundamentally fair, unanimously agreeable, and necessary for civilized coexistence and stability of the Country. 

The degree of wealth disparity between the ultra-rich and the rest has widened unprecedentedly despite creation of $14 trillion of new money in USA and trillions of dollars elsewhere in the world over the last 7 years.  This has alarmed political leaders because a similar spike in wealth inequality had led to the wrenching Great Depression in which the Country revolted against the Robber Barons, leading to the creation of the Federal Reserve.  The Federal Reserve has admitted that the 2008 crisis was worse than the Great Depression, which was triggered by the market crash of 1929 following a spike in wealth disparity.  The unprecedentedly growing wealth disparity-despite the massive credit expansion globally-proves that printing and borrowing of money endlessly (Keynesianism) cannot redress the adverse cataclysmic impact of financial market crashes caused by the established fundamentally unfair (unconstitutional) system of surreptitious robbery that makes the ultra-wealthy richer by financially bonding the rest. 

The bigwig Robber Barons and Emperors and their allies who have thus far presumed superiority of their philosophy and legitimacy of their privilege-stemming from robbery of the Country-are now getting increasingly disquiet and despondent.  They can no longer paint Hindutva as some esoteric mythology perpetuated among unenlightened idolaters;

• whose dark souls need candle light on Diwali for enlightenment (as the U.S. Southern Baptist Church once did),

• who should be induced to accept Christianity as the best path to reach God (as the Pope John Paul once said),

• who deserve to be killed for refusal to embrace Islam (for which a mountain pass for killing Hindus was named as Hindukhush),

• who should be treated as orphans for emigrating to serve the Country abroad (as stated by a Harvard 'scholar'), and

• whose revered savior (Krishna, the author of Hindutva) is painted as an amoral sexual creature (by author Wendy Doniger of University of Chicago in her book published by Penguin Books - Random House). 

The borderless global Country cannot be fooled any longer, for it now knows the epistemic truth about Hindutva as necessary for civilized coexistence, efficiency and stability. Rationally and unanimously agreeably, Hindutva is the unique fundamentally fair system of governance available for mankind for efficient civilized coexistence, i.e., by consuming the least from the earth's limited environmental resources.  This does not mean that the Robber Barons and Emperors and their associates have surrendered.  For their survival and sway over the Country, they will continue to keep the Country divided based on race, gender, religion, caste, politically demarcated country of origin, language, etc.  They will suppress the spread of a unifying philosophy or universal religion and god.  They will try all their best to undo the triumph of Hindutva by continuing to rob the Country and by throwing crumbs from the loot at the anointed-rewarded academic pundits and political leaders for spreading anti-Hindutva myths.  Duryodhan of Mahabharat did not surrender! 

My experience, however, indicates that the fundamentally unfair, unanimously disagreeable and irrational system of robbery has been all but vanquished. One tell-tale indication is the fiasco of the propaganda unleashed during the 2014 election in India to defeat a Hindutva leader by linking him to Hitler: 

• The 2014 Indian election was portrayed as a contest between the RSS and the Indian National Congress. 

• News reports had then vehemently portrayed the RSS as an organization that did not struggle for India's independence and killed Mahatma Gandhi who was the frontier of the Indian National Congress that won independence of India: 

• Enterprising Germans as well as most Europeans and Americans were as despondent and disquiet (as they are today) after they had lost their hard-earned wealth and were unemployed before the Nazi Party of Hitler rose to power. 

• The Nazi Party perhaps figured out that the traders in London had caused the crisis.  An angry Hitler then bombed London.  It was like the angry Arab militants bombing Wall Street for causing the 2001 market crash. 

• In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, many angry students, professionals and professors likewise protested by occupying Wall Street with tacit blessing from political mentors and like-minded pundits. Many members of US Congress were very angry and ready to make punitive actions against Wall Street.  The anger was contained after I wrote memos to President Obama and members of U.S. Congress about the necessity to repeal the established system of robbery, not to be vindictive towards those who operated the system.  I wish someone had convinced Hitler with such memos to repeal the system of robbery rather than killing people. 

• Instead of thinking about reforming the system of robbery, Hitler waged an irrational war against almost everyone.  The US went against Hitler only after he cornered France that had helped US gain independence from UK.[1] 

• The Nazi Party had used the revered Hindu symbol of Swastika.  The Robber Barons exploited this visual Nazi Party symbol to link the Hindutva leader, Mr. Narendra Modi, to Hitler with a view to foiling the revival of Hindutva.  Their motive was very clear: suppress Hindutva by all means, lest the Country will:
  • demand institution of Hindutva as it is the only fundamentally fair and unanimously agreeable system of governance needed for civilized coexistence and stability of humanity,
  • recognize that only Hindutva, not the current antithetic fundamentally unfair system of robbery, is supported by economic equilibrium within a contemporary comprehensive long-run mathematical model of the economy that even the Robber Barons and their elite academic gurus have failed to refute, and
  • know that the Robber Barons are opposed to Hindutva because they want to remain unfairly privileged by robbing and enervating the Country with the prevailing fundamentally unfair system of robbery. 
• That the Robber Barons failed is obvious from the following:
  • Publication in 2013 of my paper - proving that the established system is unconstitutional, unstable and inefficient - in the Journal of Financial Intermediation that claims to have 18 Nobel Laureates as authors.
  • US Congressional Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission's factual finding in 2011 that the Robber Barons and their gurus in the elite academy and cohorts in government regulatory agencies including the Chairman of the Federal Reserve were responsible for causing the manmade (avoidable) crisis of 2008.
  • Foiled attempt to assassinate the character of the author of Hindutva (Krishna) as an amoral sexual creature through publication by a top Anglo-American publisher, Penguin Books-Random House, of a book authored by Professor Wendy Doniger of U of Chicago.
  • Fiasco in trying to sway the US Congress that the financial crisis of 2008 was caused by invisible hand (god), not by the established system of robbery, notwithstanding the publication by the Oxford U Press of a book authored by Yale finance professor Gary Gorton.  This book was highly recommended by bigwigs in the elite academy of economy and finance. Yet it could not sway the US lawmakers, thanks to my research and memos submitted since 2003 and to a specific rejoinder in 2010 that the elite experts and their disciples (Masters of the Universe and government regulators including the Federal Reserve) were in fact lying in their testimony that no one saw the crisis coming.  Their testimony might have meant that no human being saw the crisis coming and that the crisis was, therefore, caused by god and that I could not be human (their god?). 
• The Robber Barons and their associates in the US government had made Hindutva leader, current prime minister Mr. Narendra Modi of Bharatiya Janata Party, untouchable as of end of October 2013.  I wrote a memo to President Obama on November 4, 2013 explaining how the unanimously agreeable and fundamentally fair first-best efficient system of governance (the essence of Hindutva) was necessary to strengthen the bond between both the Countries of USA and India.  The US government then decisively and expeditiously decided to remove the US ambassador to India and to build the needed rapport with the Hindutva leader, because he was not a reincarnation of Hitler and that he espoused a philosophy that could unify Countries worldwide.

• In a way, Hindutva is a benevolent diktat of unanimously agreeable rationale of governance that even the currently privileged Robber Barons and their allies have to embrace to serve the best interest of the Country as well as for their own survival.

The Robber Barons are, therefore, despondent and disquiet. They must be feeling ashamed before the US government authorities for their failure to impugn my character because since childhood I have never been inimical towards even those who considered me their enemy.  In fact, my research offers first-best existence for all enterprising individuals who prop everyone including the current Robber Barons as well as the rulers.  Let me illustrate this point with two alternative choices:

• Robber Barons accumulate supernormal wealth and power but the Country eventually learns that it has been robbed by a fundamentally unfair [unconstitutional], unstable, inefficient and unanimously disagreeable system.

• Robber Barons quit robbery and, like other enterprising individuals, accumulate normal wealth and power based on service to the Country governed by a fundamentally fair, efficient and stable system that I have pursued for enactment since 1991 with no self-interest and no motivation for publicity, despite enormous risk to my career, family and physical survival. 

The Robber Barons' choice obviously should be B, unless they believed that they would forever fool or tame or lure all the enterprising individuals all the time to willy-nilly accept without contest the fundamentally unfair system of robbery.  Robber Barons had indeed succeeded over the millennia before 2008 to remain rich and powerful to force everyone to kowtow willy-nilly to their system of robbery.  On the contrary, I have always believed in the ability of enterprising individuals to eventually learn the unanimously agreeable epistemic truth found in my research that a fundamentally fair system (which does not facilitate even surreptitious robbery) is necessary for civilized coexistence.  Under such unflinching belief, my pursuits obviously amounted to serving the best interest of even the Robber Barons.  Instead of rewarding for my research discoveries designed for their best interest, the Robber Barons and their elite academic gurus continued a self-defeating path of suppressing publication of my research in the media they controlled.  In the process, the elite academy and established gurus, have been found lacking publication of any research on a system of unanimously agreeable fundamental fairness for civilized coexistence.  In addition, they have been found to be following the diktats of Robber Barons to facilitate robbery of the Country. 

The Country can now screen those who are truly patriotic towards it from those who are not.  More importantly, the humanity can now think of the tranquility, civility and efficiency in its existence by spreading patriotism towards the true Country:    

• The single most source of anger for an enterprising individual is robbery of private and common wealth, facilitated by a system (rules) of governance designed to shield the robbers.  The anger is natural because the robbed individual cannot seek justice when all laws facilitating robbery are beyond judicial review. 

• A small percent of angry enterprising individuals facing a legalized system of robbery with no judicial recourse is statistically likely to become mentally agitated and violent to revolt against the state.  The state may call it terrorism.  But such terrorism can be resolved only through spreading of unanimously agreeable patriotism towards the Country.  Trying to induce the robbed Country to be patriotic pawns of the system of robbery will be futile.

• Spread of true patriotism will make Countries, globally, efficient due to potential reduction in internecine and ensuing tranquility and collaboration among enterprising individuals to create renewable resources for long-run civilized coexistence. 

With best regards,

SankarshanAcharya
Founder, Citizens for Development and Pro-Prosperity.Com
Director, Research Center on Finance and Governance